What If Apartment Complexes Had a Stake In Energy Efficiency ?
- Equipment
- mantenance
- specifications
- Construction
- Design and % of shared external walls
- Incentives and Contests
- Submeters
- Getting Republicans In On The Action
- How big a stake ?
- How would you monitor it ?
- How would you give back to residents that portion which was theirs?
- etc
I am just going to put this one out there in a totally unfinished state. You can figure it out.
Deserves to be talked about, but anything more than that would be way too premature.
One of the coolest things about a market economy such as ours is that it puts the burden of consumption on the consumer. In other words, I won't waste energy because I have to pay the bills.
- That keeps me from putting my thermostat
- up too high in winter and
- down too low in summer.
- Keeps me from wasting hot water
- etc
Problem with that approach is when it's shared.
My Apartment Was Built To Waste Energy
- Electric resistance heat (approx 30% efficient ?)
- 80% of my external walls are exposed to outside temperatures even though I am in a building
- Poorly insulated ?
- Crappy windows
- Poorly maintained equipment.
So my bills are pretty high even though I only have 840 square feet.
I didn't shop for energy when I chose the apartment, too many other variables had to come first. So really no-one has a stake in this, because it is not in the apartment owner's economic interests to provide me a better designed, constructed, and maintained structure and equipment.

Comments
Post new comment